domingo, 29 de septiembre de 2019

Overlearning, Choking, Einstellung, and Interleaving. Learning and Habits.





Final Project: Learn by teaching others how to learn
Overlearning, Choking, Einstellung, and Interleaving. Learning  and Habits.
Foreword
My main concern in Learning how to learn is to better understand how the learning process works in Human beings.
As an English Teacher and Ontological coach I have of late observed that in my preparation as a Coach, the learning/teaching process per-se was somewhat overlooked. Save in our first year where we were taught about neurosciences, we had later on, little formation as to how we functioned and why we behave the way we do, hence my interest in Learning how to Learn.
What I expect to be able to do with the knowledge gained is to begin to apply it as a High School teacher, and both as a Professional Ontological Coach and ultimately enter the world of Sports Coaching.













 

Overlearning, Choking, Einstellung, and Interleaving

In his Book “The Pressure Principle”, elite performance coach Dave Alred explains how rugby or soccer players have to re-learn about body balance and posture; not only that, but how their legs should follow through when kicking and most importantly, what  statements to make about their future performance before a World Cup final or the  final round in a golf competition. They write these statements down, in their neural nets, new belief systems are firmly set in place, getting ready for elite competition.

Overlearning, Choking, Einstellung, and Interleaving are all notions that are taken into consideration.

Alred knows about and performs  practice focused learning but is also aware of working on chunks. Chunks are pieces of information bound together through meaning or use. In training sessions jumping from one activity - focusing on them like with the Pommodoro system- but then  jumping from one to the other will prove to be much greatly  effective.  This is a structured  repetition of small chunks, for example, if Alred were to work on getting more distance on the kicks, this would be chunking applied, working for a set period of time on acquiring the knowledge in an specific area.

 But for how long to work on each task?

https://cdn2.coachmag.co.uk/sites/coachmag/files/styles/16x9_540/public/2016/04/dave_alred_jonny_wilkinson.jpg?itok=P0rbjVih&timestamp=1461141589

As was mentioned in the course:

The reality is, once you've got the basic idea down during a session, continuing to hammer away at it during the same session doesn't strengthen the kinds of long term memory connections you want to have strengthened.

Overlearning
Overlearning, some say is a positive way to obtain mastery but it can be misleading.
When Overlearning there may be gray  areas, aspects that need to be perfected and remain unseen, in short, overlearning can lead to the idea that mastery  has been acquired, an illusion, that it has “all” been mastered when what has actually been mastered is just the easy stuff. What will bear greater fruit is focusing on that which is found to be more difficult.
This then is Deliberate practice, focusing on the more difficult material will allow fopr greater progress and covering all areas of knowledge required for true mastery of the content. Neural nets are strengthened, the information in our brains is no longer fuzzy and apt to disappear but rather solid and fixed.
What then?
Once  this focused learning or overlearning does lead to true mastery, once those neural connections have been strengthened, there are other factors to consider, namely putting all the pieces into action.

An example of this is performed in Rugby. As a team, rugbiers perform the Captain's run, the training session on the day before a big game. A Captain's Run is a training session which is led by the team captain rather than by a coach. Traditionally, it takes place the day before the game. The Captain's Run is an important element of the build up for the squads. Captain's runs are never seen as that important - as they are a short session to experience the stadium and the field - but they do set a tone. Here, training is different to the focused training sessions; the captain puts into practice what was learnt in prior training sessions and it is quite  informal. Allowing the activity to flow stress free.

How productive is it?

What it does help to prevent is  Choking: entering the stadium the day before, imagining it full of people, entering the field, touching the ball, all these previous experiences avoid the choke.

 What is Choking?

Call it stage fright or anxiety, choking is the moment when the brain tends to shut down, get stuck and paralyzed. Everything around us seems to narrow down, get slightly darker, noises are more distantm, we hear our hearts, we don´t know what to do.

 What to do? How to deal with this?

Train for it, find focused solutions, work in different ways and with different perspectives.

Einstellung
A good example of this is also found in Alred´s book where he explains how he trained kicker Johnny Wilkinson and corrected his body posture assuming  a “Posture of Command”, a different posture to  Wilkinson´s, an upright posture, balanced and centered which allowed him to move differently.

Einstellung is ,simply put,like a roadblock that stops you from seeing a new, better solution.
 Einstellung is the blockade that Wilkinson overcame,  by creating  this new  neural pattern  Wilkinson  developed a better solution to his effective, but not superior, performance.
  A less tiring , more effective ,greater distance producing kick, for example.
If not for his coach, Wilkinson would have done a solely focused activity, repeating the same style of kick over and over, falling into a rut that would prevent him from finding something more effective.
He would basically have been stuck in a mindset (Einstellung) a zombie- like, behavior let´s say- without ever creating a change. The key here for both Alred and Wilkinson was to unlearn, to deconstruct certain thinking routines and even physical behaviors and move on to new, more effective ones.
.  

Interleaving
We mentioned previously, the Captain´s Run and  rugby  training sessions, where different forms of training  are applied.  Interleaving is also used during sports training,  where jumping back and forth between specific training activities, such as line outs, or tackles, or scrums helps reach more effective and productive results.
 These activities require different techniques or strategies; the coach proposes different problematics that call for  different solutions from the players, the idea is for the brain to get accustomed , to learn apply different  problem solving techniques, helping for a deeper ,more effective style of learning.


As was stated in the course

“Although practice and repetition is important in helping build solid neural patterns to draw on, it's interleaving that starts building flexibility and creativity It's where you leave the world of practice and repetition, and begin
thinking more independently.”

 “When you interleave within one subject or one discipline, you begin to develop your creative power within that discipline. When you interleave between several subjects or disciplines, you can more easily make interesting new connections between chunks in the different fields, which can enhance your creativity even further.

This is the reason why sports coaches observe other coaches form different disciplines, they develop and bring in expertise from different fields, acquiring new ideas and enriching the team´s know- how and increasing their problem solving abilities.

This interdisciplinary learning keeps you creative, passionate and youthful, all very positive and healthy for the brain.

But what if we can´t get off the couch?

Distractions,Procrastination, why generate good habits



Essentially the school of Chilean Biologist Humberto Maturana teaches us in his Autopoiesis that:
The term autopoiesis (from Greek αὐτo- (auto-), meaning 'self', and ποίησις (poiesis), meaning 'creation, production') refers to a system capable of reproducing and maintaining itself. The original definition can be found in Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living (1st edition 1973, 2nd 1980):[1]
Page 16: It was in these circumstances ... in which he analyzed Don Quixote's dilemma of whether to follow the path of arms (praxis, action) or the path of letters (poiesis, creation, production), I understood for the first time the power of the word "poiesis" and invented the word that we needed: autopoiesis. This was a word without a history, a word that could directly mean what takes place in the dynamics of the autonomy proper to living systems.

Page 78: An autopoietic machine is a machine organized (defined as a unity) as a network of processes of production (transformation and destruction) of components which: (i) through their interactions and transformations continuously regenerate and realize the network of processes (relations) that produced them; and (ii) constitute it (the machine) as a concrete unity in space in which they (the components) exist by specifying the topological domain of its realization as such a network.[2]
On the other hand,In his Blog, Dr. Joe Dispenza tells us:
 Knowledge and information. If we’re not taking the time to contemplate what we want, to write things down and learn new information, then how do we know what’s possible? If we’re not filling our brains with knowledge, then we won’t know the dream job exists…, or create something out of nothing—and therefore, we’re not even aware of the possibility. Knowledge and information are the very raw materials of creation.”
“You’ve heard me say knowledge is the precursor to experience. Put in other words, knowledge is the foundation that allows us to dream bigger. The more knowledge we gain—the more we read or learn about people who have done what we’re setting out to do—the more inspired we are to make the possibility become a reality.”
(Neuroscientist Joe Dispenza, … received his Doctor of Chiropractic Degree from Life University in Atlanta, Georgia, graduating magna cum laude. His postgraduate education has been in neurology, neuroscience, brain function and chemistry, cellular biology, memory formation, and aging and longevity.)
Here then is when it all gets  more interesting.
We find that we are:
Beings that  have the faculty of Autopoiesis: ” …organized (defined as a unity) as a network of processes of production (transformation and destruction) of components which: (i) through their interactions and transformations continuously regenerate and realize the network of processes (relations) that produced them”
That  when something is made manifest, ideas come into the world not only by oral manifestation but become realities in our brains, we create new neural paths and thoughts, concepts upheld by Echeverria from the world of Philosophy and Ontological Coaching, as well as Dr.Joe Dispenza in the world of Neuroscience.
It seems then that we have much at hand but we are unable to harness al this power we have.
Distractions,Procrastination,not knowing the essentials of our own (well) being, how we operate, not knowing how to hack into our own systems, ultimately generates frustration and sadness, even depression.
As a result, putting all these elements together makes us more powerful human beings, more dynamic, more able to understand ourselves and do that one thing which leads us to a better life, the one thing that we human beings cannot do without: progress.
Progress  leads to positivity to optimism, to a better world and there can be none of this without learning.
We are unable to put any of these “SuperPowers” to good use if we cannot deal with Procrastination, if we cannot get ourselves up from the couch or focus for the right amount of time to learn something new, to generate these new pathways, these new positive Routines that will spur us on to new, improved realities.
HABITS
As we observed, the 4 parts involved in creating these new habits involve
1.The cue
2.The routine
3.The reward
4.The belief
Especially in a world with more and more screens and distractions, getting into a state of flow will become increasingly difficult, hence adopting routines that help focus rather than increase distraction, become fundamental.
Hungarian-American Psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi explains how this state of Flow works, how we enter a heightened sensorial state and deep concentration where our brains are super-performing; but we cannot reach this level if we cannot elaborate the proper routines prior to entering the state.
The Cue is that which impedes taking those first steps, these are  the prior, habitual steps  which we regularly take as part of our procrastinating routine.
The Routine
We may decide to watch another episode of  “Swat” before tackling a paper we have to write, knowing this will take us all the way  into dinner time, and having to prepare it and only having a few minutes left before going to bed-because our system starts to shut down- hence having very little time left to write the paper and leaving it, once again, for tomorrow. This is the Zombie mode, the routine, the numb unproductive flow of things that we fall into automatically and get us back -or rather keep us- on square one.
The solution would be to not even get close to the T.V. and head straight for the computer. Prior to that, getting a glass of water, some cookies or crackers and going to the toilet before getting started, all typical “excuses”  or “tricks”-the different cues- the brain might resort to in order to get us out of doing what we really should be doing, getting our buttocks onto the chair.
The Reward
A new stimulus surges in the brain, a new pathway, the neural nets find pleasure in something different. Before, “Swat” was the reward for a long day at the office but now, the pleasure of getting things done and short-in between rewards- make us feel good too.
The Pommodoro technique, by which we assign a time for full- on focusing, -once a 25 minute lapse, another of maybe 20 minutes-, allows us to now get things done in stints, getting chunks of information into our brains.
After these 20/25 minutes, a chocolate, a stroll even, with some time off, the brain can now change modes, de-contract and get ready for another short round of Pommodoro to get things done.
These short occasional stints are much more effective than an all- out,5 hour study session de day prior to examinations where memory cannot withhold information.

The belief  (and the other books I have on my desk)
Finally the Belief.
 I have on my desk “Legacy” by James Kerr, “Catching the Big Fish” by David Lynch, “The Creative Spirit” by Daniel Goleman, “Emotions and feelings” by Daniel Lopez Rosetti, “Titans” by Tim Ferris, “Leadership” by Sir Alex Ferguson and my favourite, “Brave New World” by Guillem Balague/Mauricio Pochettino.
An assortment of books that deal with transformation of individuals, in one way or another involving  the same topic. 
They are all dealing with human beings, they are or have been leaders or in touch with leaders, or have led themselves, be it in the arts, in sport, in medicine.
They have all learnt about or created routines that have allowed them to make movies, successfully lead teams, train managers and treat patients. They are or have been more or less capable of learning and teaching others. They have understood that beliefs can be transferred but they have believed in themselves before anyone else did.
Dr Oakley states:
“Habits have power because of your belief in them. Finding ways to reward good study habits is important for escaping procrastination.(But)  good habits can also be rewarded. To change a habit, you'll need to change your underlying belief.”
In order to learn, be it through diffused or focused learning, to better tap into our creativity as Dali or Lynch would do or to remember the facts we need for our science paper, or to concentrate before a penalty kick, we previously need to create new routines, good habits that will get us somewhere new.
The possibility of learning, of improved learning allows us to reach for someplace different, it will ultimately allow us to keep up our good spirits, to stay us positive and believe that something better, a different future, is possible through learning.
What seems crucial to all of the above is then only one thing.
 Belief.

lunes, 29 de julio de 2019

What future WITH education?

In an ideal world, how do you think education should be organised? What priorities do you think it should reflect? and who should be responsible for ensuring that it is of a good quality? Is there anything from the padlet wall that has informed your position? Your entry should be a minimum of 200 words. In an ideal world, education should be at the top of the list.Quite simply as when,for example creating the best retirment plans for the elderly will be to out benefit, it should be clear that today´s investment will show its effects in the future. Very much like the tamarind. Perhaps then, if the issue is that governments are too concerned with a "short-term" strategy, maybe the plans themselves should be set in motion and governed by other entities, independent ones that are there once those that administer governments are gone. Maybe this is the way to organise it as far as the institutions are concerned. Once this is taken care of and the entity has more flexibility and speed for adaptability, can analize results and take rapid action, al else should follow suit.It does sound like some form of outsourcing and I do wonder if it would not be more effective this way.This entity would be held accountable by the government who will be giving them the funds to operate and observing and evaluating results. Common issues and most of it is complaints I´ve read in the forums aim at corrupt governments,poorly paid teachers, lack of proper design and efficiency of study plans, it seems all but Finland has a decent and effective system. I believe the issues are being observed from a perspective of what education should be like and not what kind of world we want to make with it. We observe that the world is moving faster and faster but we take it as it is instead of creating the world we truly need, one without poor and hungry, one of equality, of peace and harmony.

domingo, 21 de julio de 2019

Education,lifelong learning,social classes

How has your experience of school shaped you as a learner, and as an adult? There was a really sharp contrast between the schooling I received in South Africa and in Argentina. Needless to say, in South Africa in the 70's we were part of apartheidt so there was a clear education of the social classes or basically a social education which upheld a system in place.That having been said, it shaped the way I though for a long time to come.Argentina,with all its pitfalls,was not a racist country and so what ideas I had if any, in that respect faded away, what did stick with me for long was more than an idea, but fear. Fear was instilled in me as we were educated "under threat of",as a consequence I abhor teaching my students under threat and despise situations where I cannot get them to respond otherwise.That fear persisted with me until a couple of years back,after therapy and coaching. I cannot precisely recall how primary shaped me as a learner, I do remember having acquired order and pragmatism a lot of which were lost in secondary, (funnilly enough!) but it did give me a lot more creative freedom. As far as social classes and schooling in Argentina, the public schooling system in many parts of the country, was and still is today, concerned about keeping kids in schools and out of streets, and getting them to have breakfast and lunch. Socially, shcooling was much more intersperesed.There were kids from the lower classes, middle low, plain middle class and middle to upper classes al attending the same school, though oddly enough,I recall that many of the richer kids were somehow put together in the same course too. I do not think that we learnt any different learners but have to agree some learnt faster than others depending on social class.There were no private schools in my city back then, no uniforms or the kind. We did have, the same as in South Africa, technical or commercial schools and that was about it at the time.Being schooled and nothing fancy In what ways do you think your own schooling could have been improved, and what priorities do you think are the most important for schools today? Could it be said that we were taught for a change of the world?Hardly. In both countries we were part of a system and could see no further beyond it, specially between ages 7 and 14, later on at 16 or 18 we saw what was happening around us but were not involved with current issues the way they are today,much more informed. I like this concept on Lifelong learning; The idea of lifelong education was first fully articulated in this century by Basil Yeaxlee (1929). He along with Eduard Lindeman (1926) provided an intellectual basis for a comprehensive understanding of education as a continuing aspect of everyday life. I did appreciate the fact that my primary school had carpintery, photography,cooking class and some other subjects that I did not even have in secondary which prepared for life,so in a way,it was topsy turvy, when I was about to leave for the "real world" I was not getting ready in high school. Neither was I aware of the concept of lifelong learning, I thought it was University next and then life. Is it good for a teenager to know of it? Maybe not at that time but I was not taught about it and my teachers in University did not mention it as a concept per se.It would have been good for me to know about it at the time. . What priorities do you think are the most important for schools today? I do not think that any of the 3 schools I went to had a vision that kids would ultimately be the creators of a new world which is what should have been done back then. To be fair, I cannot know if that was the case, maybe they did and this world is the result.I believe that ultimately schools should prepare us for the real world, develop emotional intelligence at all social levels, but not to prepare us for what´s to come but to mould it,to change it for what we really need, considerate to the environment and to other human beings.Ultimately get an education that does that and all else will follow suit.

jueves, 11 de julio de 2019

From the Greeks to the present

I believe that the analysis of education and pedagogy stems from a single root, it has been looked at through one particular lens, for eons. Most of our western world´s takes on education stem from the metaphysics,the classic greek phylosophers and their conceptions which forged belief systems ,deeply rooted systems that still stand to this day. We have observed and read and analysed education from a perspective that is common ground to us all in the western world. I wonder what information we have on education prior to Communism or even during,why not?- in China or Asia or other forms of education in the ancient worlds of Latin America? Why not amalyze them? We keep going back to the same sources for most everything, the Greeks. And we study people who have studied them in turn. That´s why I most enjoyed these last series of videos with professor Moore as I enjoyed his take, one where Emotional Intelligence is mentioned and considered, where we accept that we are flawed individuals who make mistakes and we are, as individuals, a work in progress, one where there is no longer a stigma with making mistakes and the student is considered a human being. Also,I found particularly useful and I agreed with the point of view of Eisner or Mcintyre for example on teaching being an art, being able to adapt and improvise to get through to the student, is truly an art. I wonder then, if ,to get good teachers, the arts should not be as important as other subjects in school curriculums as Prof. Ken Robinson states? I remember having a good teacher when I returned from South Africa to Argentina and having had mostly bad teachers too, around that time. In South Africa I was bullied by both students and teachers; most teacher lacked empathy and in a system that enforced physcal punishment, and as a sensitive child who had migrated,I was made to suffer as my needs, I recall, were overlooked. I was made to swim without being havinf been actually being properly taught to swim for instance (I learnt at age 40), so I had plenty of bad teachers if in fact, a teacher should adapt to his student,observe his/her needs, be empathic and the like. Another bad teacher here in Argentina just was more of the same; I remember her because she could not understand how I had no idea of Argentine history and it´s political figures. When I finally spoke up,I was changed to the afternoon shift where my new teacher was comforting,created the right environment for me to learn, was considerate and understanding, and that, though I had plenty of reasons to be sad at this move back to a strange and unstable country, was enough for me. That for me, at least at the time, was a good teacher , she helped me to adapt One thing which we have yet not studied in this course is education in a world that is changing faster than we can adapt to it. What role for education and educators then? To prepare the world or to prepare for it? We have prepared for it,while we have changed it so much that we have to prepare in order to fix it up again and education systems seem to still be working around the idea of preparing for the world and not so much in making it a better place. So, here I would agree with Freire and his take on Pedagogy of the Oppressed. “Education either functions as an instrument which is used to facilitate integration of the younger generation into the logic of the present system and bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom, the means by which men and women deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to participate in the transformation of their world.” This still holds very true today. Educator Politicians who draw up Educational syllabuses and systems will keep us in the same loop. We are-ecologically and with other threats such as A.I.- at a time in the world were we cannot afford this luxury. Although I believe that we could learn more easily by letting go of the "classics" and their lens through we which we have observed the world, I do agree with the initial idea of a pedagogue being someone who accompanied and prepared for life, I believe it is still valuable today, kids feel really lonely and isolated adn we don´t seem to be using the right tools to help. A good teacher must therefore prepare for life but for the life to come, a life which we will create for each other. How to do it? By teaching firstly what it is like to live as a community, in harmony,addressing each others needs. As professor Moore so aptly put it, there is Education "for the poor" but "why should there be poor in the first place"?

domingo, 7 de julio de 2019

Standardized tests,cultural issues and opportunities

• I was made to take computerized tests in primary school,with general knowledge evaluations for which I performed on an average of 7 points. I was evaluated and judged by my teachers as above average but not superb, that If I just put my back into it though,I would probably excell.I was also evaluated in sports at which I improved over the years, I was given the opportunity and did very well, reaching the provincial trials. I was not asked or evaluated on my intrapersonal skills,that I remember,It was more of a personal quest. Later, having gone from an anglo saxon educational system and culture, moving to the Argentine system proved to be a tough challenge. Opportunities were different on account of a difference in national education budgets and a different cultural perception and approach to education. There were no standardized tests that I recall, just the regular testing for each subject. The only standardized test I took was for my English FCE evaluations I don´t recall space for much reflection either, this was done outside school though in other spaces but not on our learning or mistakes in learning for improvement. At the third level, initially we did not consider public university as an option on account of poor facilities and a compulsory 1 year general leveling course common to all 1st year entrees which we regarded as a waste of time. We opted to study by post with the University of Cape Town which proved nigh impossible as the postal service was very slow and telephone communications were difficult. As a result, the judgments people have made about me that have been affected by an assessment of my "intelligence" in this case it was not considering these kind of issues that affected my feedback and learning; teachers and the university were inflexible and I failed to qualify for the final test by 5 points, in short,context was not taken into account. Notwithstanding, I do believe myself to be a learner as I have learnt from all these different experiences. Being a human being is to undergo constant change and learn constantly. “No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man” Heraclitus

miércoles, 3 de julio de 2019

I believe that education should be adaptive to the culture of the nation, even specific area or region where it is to be delivered, adaptive to the individual and his/her environment as well as the needs of the time. It does happen for example in my country,Argentina, that education is sometimes purpose driven,given to children in agricultural villages or small towns, whereas in big cities, such as Buenos Aires, it tends to be more generic with some sort of major (2 or 3 to choose from). In both cases,however, as in many other parts of the country, there is a lack of focus on some sort of connection with one´s body for example, be it through dance or some sort of physical expression, other than gym classes. I agree with the belief that being connected with one´s being is essential for interaction with other human beings.As Sir Ken Robinson states, there are other subjects-such as dance or music- which are considered less relevant than others but that have nowadays been proven to be important for a person´s development. Many of the forms of learning mentioned are –in my opinion-useful and adaptive to this purpose and at the same time incomplete for it and a little outdated unless they can adapt to the current age. On the one hand ,for example, Behaviourism can help to change people´s attitudes, Humanism, on the other hand, seems appropriate for the inner quest that current philosophers state that is needed for a change in the world. Most of them, however, if not all, having being established with a train of thought in which the western world was founded, that of the Metaphysical Philosophers (Aristotle,Socrates and Plato) which has ultimately lead us to where we are in the world, fall under the same scope of vision. As a result, a change in our philosophical foundations would be needed in order to establish new forms of learning based on a different philosophical perspective based on the likes such as Heidegger ,Nitsche and Wittgenstein.